<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick take:  Landor &amp; Hawa Sub-0-G 20.5&#8243; Upright &#8211; lightweight, tough wonder!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.practicalhacks.com/2010/01/14/quick-take-landor-hawa-sub-0-g-20-5-upright-lightweight-tough-wonder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2010/01/14/quick-take-landor-hawa-sub-0-g-20-5-upright-lightweight-tough-wonder/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear, and greatness for people on the go</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael W.</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2010/01/14/quick-take-landor-hawa-sub-0-g-20-5-upright-lightweight-tough-wonder/comment-page-1/#comment-5973</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=9054#comment-5973</guid>
		<description>Totally agree it&#039;s for carry-on &quot;almost&quot; exclusively.

In that context it is invaluable for people with back or shoulder problems who want a wheelie and are confounded by the semi-absurd 15 lb. limit some carriers impose on carry-on luggage - like all the Asian carriers I fly on international trips and, from what I hear, on all flights through Heathrow. Since the average wheelie can weigh up to 9 lbs just by itself, that doesn&#039;t leave much room for clothing.

In that context the light weight of the Landor makes up for its slightly less robust construction. Note that WE are not likely to break this or wear a hole in the fabric. But baggage handlers (called &quot;baggage throwers&quot; in Fight Club) are from an alternate universe with DNA derived from a combination of gorillas and Mr. Hyde. Though they have human form, their sole purpose in existence is to Destroy Checked Luggage. When confronted with the results of their mischief, they have a smile that would make the Cheshire Cat envious. That&#039;s one of the reason I tape soft-sided luggage handles together. One of their favorite tricks is to fail to use the Velcro handle wrapper on my soft bags after &quot;inspecting&quot; their contents (generally foraging for food, I suspect) so that their brethren further down the line can yank on a single handle and start a separation between the webbing  and the side of the bag. Neat trick, took me a while to learn how to work around that one.

Here in the USA I would much rather use something solidly made like the Rick Steves wheelie or the classic indestructible Costco. That way if push comes to shove, I can check it knowing I am contributing to worker compensation claims for hernias but my bag will get home intact.

But generally I use soft bags these days. They fit so much better in the back of small Asian taxis where most the the trunk is taken up by a propane tank, and fit better on my lap on a  long bus ride to a beach resort. But that gets us into hard vs. soft luggage, a different kettle of bags altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree it&#8217;s for carry-on &#8220;almost&#8221; exclusively.</p>
<p>In that context it is invaluable for people with back or shoulder problems who want a wheelie and are confounded by the semi-absurd 15 lb. limit some carriers impose on carry-on luggage &#8211; like all the Asian carriers I fly on international trips and, from what I hear, on all flights through Heathrow. Since the average wheelie can weigh up to 9 lbs just by itself, that doesn&#8217;t leave much room for clothing.</p>
<p>In that context the light weight of the Landor makes up for its slightly less robust construction. Note that WE are not likely to break this or wear a hole in the fabric. But baggage handlers (called &#8220;baggage throwers&#8221; in Fight Club) are from an alternate universe with DNA derived from a combination of gorillas and Mr. Hyde. Though they have human form, their sole purpose in existence is to Destroy Checked Luggage. When confronted with the results of their mischief, they have a smile that would make the Cheshire Cat envious. That&#8217;s one of the reason I tape soft-sided luggage handles together. One of their favorite tricks is to fail to use the Velcro handle wrapper on my soft bags after &#8220;inspecting&#8221; their contents (generally foraging for food, I suspect) so that their brethren further down the line can yank on a single handle and start a separation between the webbing  and the side of the bag. Neat trick, took me a while to learn how to work around that one.</p>
<p>Here in the USA I would much rather use something solidly made like the Rick Steves wheelie or the classic indestructible Costco. That way if push comes to shove, I can check it knowing I am contributing to worker compensation claims for hernias but my bag will get home intact.</p>
<p>But generally I use soft bags these days. They fit so much better in the back of small Asian taxis where most the the trunk is taken up by a propane tank, and fit better on my lap on a  long bus ride to a beach resort. But that gets us into hard vs. soft luggage, a different kettle of bags altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2010/01/14/quick-take-landor-hawa-sub-0-g-20-5-upright-lightweight-tough-wonder/comment-page-1/#comment-5972</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=9054#comment-5972</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my take: I would not recommend this bag to travelers who want to check their luggage. As a carry-on, it&#039;s sufficiently durable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my take: I would not recommend this bag to travelers who want to check their luggage. As a carry-on, it&#8217;s sufficiently durable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2010/01/14/quick-take-landor-hawa-sub-0-g-20-5-upright-lightweight-tough-wonder/comment-page-1/#comment-5971</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=9054#comment-5971</guid>
		<description>Since I had the internal rod of the bag replaced, I still have to be careful regarding the durability of the bag.  Kovacs, the luggage repair store in Pasadena, CA, put a patch on one of the tears.  Since that time, it was torn again.  I have put handle with care labels on the bag when travelling.  It has helped a little.  I would not recommend this bag to other travelers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I had the internal rod of the bag replaced, I still have to be careful regarding the durability of the bag.  Kovacs, the luggage repair store in Pasadena, CA, put a patch on one of the tears.  Since that time, it was torn again.  I have put handle with care labels on the bag when travelling.  It has helped a little.  I would not recommend this bag to other travelers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2010/01/14/quick-take-landor-hawa-sub-0-g-20-5-upright-lightweight-tough-wonder/comment-page-1/#comment-5970</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=9054#comment-5970</guid>
		<description>Christine, 

As I (think) I mentioned in the post, I would not check this bag. It&#039;s plenty tough, but I don&#039;t believe it&#039;d hold up really well if checked with any frequency. 

Just my $ .02</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine, </p>
<p>As I (think) I mentioned in the post, I would not check this bag. It&#8217;s plenty tough, but I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;d hold up really well if checked with any frequency. </p>
<p>Just my $ .02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2010/01/14/quick-take-landor-hawa-sub-0-g-20-5-upright-lightweight-tough-wonder/comment-page-1/#comment-5968</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 13:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=9054#comment-5968</guid>
		<description>Hi , I saw the model  of the sub -O-G at Singapore very lightweight the largest size only 2.51kg , I the first time see that luggage very light . May i know that material is strong enough for check in  ? I know the structure fiberglass is strong but how  is the fabric stitching ? Easy get tear ? I will buy and try the qualitily .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi , I saw the model  of the sub -O-G at Singapore very lightweight the largest size only 2.51kg , I the first time see that luggage very light . May i know that material is strong enough for check in  ? I know the structure fiberglass is strong but how  is the fabric stitching ? Easy get tear ? I will buy and try the qualitily .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.367 seconds -->

