<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Take:  Patagonia Lightweight Travel Duffel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.practicalhacks.com/2009/04/22/first-take-patagonia-lightweight-travel-duffel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2009/04/22/first-take-patagonia-lightweight-travel-duffel/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear, and greatness for people on the go</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2009/04/22/first-take-patagonia-lightweight-travel-duffel/comment-page-1/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=5627#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>My MLC size was not the problem on euro airlines, so much as weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My MLC size was not the problem on euro airlines, so much as weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2009/04/22/first-take-patagonia-lightweight-travel-duffel/comment-page-1/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=5627#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>Maximus:  The MLC is smaller than:  a) Patagonia claims it is, and b) the maximum allowable luggage size per all U.S./N.A. airlines.  I can&#039;t speak to the requirements for European airlines, as you suggest, as they apparently vary from airline to airline.  Refer to this article:  http://travelsentry.blogspot.com/2008/05/what-carry-on-luggage-to-take-to-europe.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maximus:  The MLC is smaller than:  a) Patagonia claims it is, and b) the maximum allowable luggage size per all U.S./N.A. airlines.  I can&#8217;t speak to the requirements for European airlines, as you suggest, as they apparently vary from airline to airline.  Refer to this article:  <a href="http://travelsentry.blogspot.com/2008/05/what-carry-on-luggage-to-take-to-europe.html" rel="nofollow">http://travelsentry.blogspot.c.....urope.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximus P.</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2009/04/22/first-take-patagonia-lightweight-travel-duffel/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=5627#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>Hello....just a comment about your admittedly innocent observation that the MLC is a bit smaller than the &quot;max legal carry on&quot; standards of airlines.  I can speak from first hand experience that your observation is not necessarily true. I have had to repack my MLC to conform to the standard space requirements on two separate european flights. Perhaps your view is very North American centric?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello&#8230;.just a comment about your admittedly innocent observation that the MLC is a bit smaller than the &#8220;max legal carry on&#8221; standards of airlines.  I can speak from first hand experience that your observation is not necessarily true. I have had to repack my MLC to conform to the standard space requirements on two separate european flights. Perhaps your view is very North American centric?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael W.</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2009/04/22/first-take-patagonia-lightweight-travel-duffel/comment-page-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=5627#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, I won&#039;t have to open the Paty duffel in-flight to put my transit jacket inside. I can just stuff it under the compression straps, loosened to minimize wrinkling. I am hoping I won&#039;t need the inflight pull-over, but some flights are frigid and some are a little warm, you never know, and I&#039;d rather be prepared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, I won&#8217;t have to open the Paty duffel in-flight to put my transit jacket inside. I can just stuff it under the compression straps, loosened to minimize wrinkling. I am hoping I won&#8217;t need the inflight pull-over, but some flights are frigid and some are a little warm, you never know, and I&#8217;d rather be prepared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael W.</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2009/04/22/first-take-patagonia-lightweight-travel-duffel/comment-page-1/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=5627#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Some trial packing observations:

My itinerary in Thailand has changed. I will not be able to leave my checked bag at the arrival hotel during our trip to Koh Samed, because we will be staying at a different hotel once we return to Bangkok.

I don&#039;t want to haul around 3 different bags (personal bag - small day pack; carryon; checked) to Samed and back, and I don&#039;t want to leave a bag with relatives that I will have to retrieve later - Bangkok taxis are best appreciated from a distance, not from inside.

So this small change means I have to ditch my favored carryon bag, a now-discontinued Timbuk2 gym duffel, for the Paty Duffel - why - because I want to be able to pack my carryon into the checked bag to reduce my bag count to a more manageable 2 bags to Samed and back. And the T2 duffel is just too bulky and heavy to stick into the checked bag.

BTW I am reducing some of my redundant clothing - I was going to take enough so I wouldn&#039;t have to sink wash or do laundry, but since I am going to 1.25 bag it to Samed, I need room in the checked bag for my carryon bag and its contents.

So I removed half the underwear and socks from my carryon. 

Then I tried trial packing a Paty Lightweight Courier. Whoops, too small, although it would pack down to nothing to fit into the  checked bag later.

Next, the new Paty Lightweight Duffel.

Yep, room to spare.

Rick Steves packing cube in sideways (to push out the sides, pushed down to the &quot;bottom&quot;, the end away from the haul strap. Perfect fit!

Next, a very bulk Under Armour smooth-face fleece hoody, rolled up and stuffed into an old sleeping bag stuff sack. This fit on the other end of the duffel, on the floor.

Toiletries kit on top of that.

Light in-flight pullover on top of the Steves cube.

Room left over, yeah! (TSA pouch in convenient, exterior accessible end pouch. Perfect size. Yeah!)

Now I see why they have the compression buckles, they take any stress of the zipper on a moderately full packing.

I only made two modifications, to my personal taste:

1. I cut down an old camping foam pad to fit the bottom, to cushion and add a little extra structure.

2. I am going to be carrying vertically by the end haul strap, and it cuts into my hand, so I used a Bucky &quot;handle wrapper&quot; to add some bulk and cushion to that strap - it has an i.d. holder on the inside of the wrapper, which is a nice touch.

Resulting weight? 7 pounds.

Ability to repack the contents into the half-empty Steves Classic &quot;Europe through the back door&quot; bag, and then put the empty, light, non-bulky Paty Duffel into it, so I&#039;m just &quot;one bagging&quot; it?

Priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some trial packing observations:</p>
<p>My itinerary in Thailand has changed. I will not be able to leave my checked bag at the arrival hotel during our trip to Koh Samed, because we will be staying at a different hotel once we return to Bangkok.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to haul around 3 different bags (personal bag &#8211; small day pack; carryon; checked) to Samed and back, and I don&#8217;t want to leave a bag with relatives that I will have to retrieve later &#8211; Bangkok taxis are best appreciated from a distance, not from inside.</p>
<p>So this small change means I have to ditch my favored carryon bag, a now-discontinued Timbuk2 gym duffel, for the Paty Duffel &#8211; why &#8211; because I want to be able to pack my carryon into the checked bag to reduce my bag count to a more manageable 2 bags to Samed and back. And the T2 duffel is just too bulky and heavy to stick into the checked bag.</p>
<p>BTW I am reducing some of my redundant clothing &#8211; I was going to take enough so I wouldn&#8217;t have to sink wash or do laundry, but since I am going to 1.25 bag it to Samed, I need room in the checked bag for my carryon bag and its contents.</p>
<p>So I removed half the underwear and socks from my carryon. </p>
<p>Then I tried trial packing a Paty Lightweight Courier. Whoops, too small, although it would pack down to nothing to fit into the  checked bag later.</p>
<p>Next, the new Paty Lightweight Duffel.</p>
<p>Yep, room to spare.</p>
<p>Rick Steves packing cube in sideways (to push out the sides, pushed down to the &#8220;bottom&#8221;, the end away from the haul strap. Perfect fit!</p>
<p>Next, a very bulk Under Armour smooth-face fleece hoody, rolled up and stuffed into an old sleeping bag stuff sack. This fit on the other end of the duffel, on the floor.</p>
<p>Toiletries kit on top of that.</p>
<p>Light in-flight pullover on top of the Steves cube.</p>
<p>Room left over, yeah! (TSA pouch in convenient, exterior accessible end pouch. Perfect size. Yeah!)</p>
<p>Now I see why they have the compression buckles, they take any stress of the zipper on a moderately full packing.</p>
<p>I only made two modifications, to my personal taste:</p>
<p>1. I cut down an old camping foam pad to fit the bottom, to cushion and add a little extra structure.</p>
<p>2. I am going to be carrying vertically by the end haul strap, and it cuts into my hand, so I used a Bucky &#8220;handle wrapper&#8221; to add some bulk and cushion to that strap &#8211; it has an i.d. holder on the inside of the wrapper, which is a nice touch.</p>
<p>Resulting weight? 7 pounds.</p>
<p>Ability to repack the contents into the half-empty Steves Classic &#8220;Europe through the back door&#8221; bag, and then put the empty, light, non-bulky Paty Duffel into it, so I&#8217;m just &#8220;one bagging&#8221; it?</p>
<p>Priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.455 seconds -->

