<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubiquity: Experimental Firefox extension which adds remarkable functionality &amp; speed to browsing!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.practicalhacks.com/2008/09/09/ubiquity-experimental-firefox-extension-which-adds-remarkable-functionality-speed-to-browsing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2008/09/09/ubiquity-experimental-firefox-extension-which-adds-remarkable-functionality-speed-to-browsing/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear, and greatness for people on the go</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:41:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael W.</title>
		<link>http://www.practicalhacks.com/2008/09/09/ubiquity-experimental-firefox-extension-which-adds-remarkable-functionality-speed-to-browsing/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalhacks.com/?p=1142#comment-377</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hilarious that many of the early commentators/reviewers of Google&#039;s new Chrome browser were ragging on Google for &quot;stealing&quot; thunder from Firefox.

They forgot a couple of things:

Google has been financially supporting the Mozilla foundation that develops Firefox; and

The good stuff in Chrome, the good code, is open sourced so Mozilla can use it to upgrade Firefox too.

I suspect Ubiquity owes some code to Chrome.

I wonder if Google enhanced any of Apple&#039;s Webkit code - Apple can use that in Safari.

I like the new software model, where improvements at Google/Apple/Firefox/BSDS help the other parties as well.

Makes MS look like a stick in the mud. 

Of course MS probably has more employees than all the rest put together. They don&#039;t call them MicroSerfs for nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hilarious that many of the early commentators/reviewers of Google&#8217;s new Chrome browser were ragging on Google for &#8220;stealing&#8221; thunder from Firefox.</p>
<p>They forgot a couple of things:</p>
<p>Google has been financially supporting the Mozilla foundation that develops Firefox; and</p>
<p>The good stuff in Chrome, the good code, is open sourced so Mozilla can use it to upgrade Firefox too.</p>
<p>I suspect Ubiquity owes some code to Chrome.</p>
<p>I wonder if Google enhanced any of Apple&#8217;s Webkit code &#8211; Apple can use that in Safari.</p>
<p>I like the new software model, where improvements at Google/Apple/Firefox/BSDS help the other parties as well.</p>
<p>Makes MS look like a stick in the mud. </p>
<p>Of course MS probably has more employees than all the rest put together. They don&#8217;t call them MicroSerfs for nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
